The US State Department said in a report that Beijing has spent billions of dollars annually on information manipulation efforts, including by acquiring stakes in foreign media through \u201cpublic and non-public means,\u201d sponsoring online influencers and securing distribution agreements that promote unlabelled Chinese government content.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
President Xi Jinping on television.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>AP<\/cite><\/p>\n \u201cBeijing uses false or biased information to promote positive views of the PRC and the Chinese Communist Party,\u201d the report stated. \u201cAt the same time, the PRC suppresses critical information that contradicts its desired narratives on issues such as Taiwan, its human rights practices, the South China Sea, its domestic economy, and international economic engagement.\u201d<\/p>\n The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In July, Beijing responded to a NATO communiqu\u00e9 accusing it of coercive policies and spreading disinformation by saying the statement disregarded basic facts, deliberately discredited China and distorted its policies.<\/p>\n How China and Russia recycle each others\u2019 content.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>US State Dept\/Internet<\/cite><\/p>\n The US report comes amid controversy over China\u2019s efforts in recent years to expand the global footprint of its government-controlled media, especially as geopolitical competition between Beijing and Washington has intensified. Chinese leaders have sought to combat the negative images of China they feel are spread by world media.<\/p>\n Citing public reports and \u201cnewly acquired government information,\u201d the State Department\u2019s Global Engagement Centre said that Beijing had created its own information ecosystem by co-opting foreign political elites and journalists.<\/p>\n China and Russia routinely support each other\u2019s narratives, the report said.<\/p>\n \u201cIn a recurring pattern, PRC state media amplify unverified or debunked claims from Russian media, which Russian outlets then cite to portray the Kremlin\u2019s views and its aggression against Ukraine as widely supported.\u201c<\/p>\n China had also invested in satellite networks and digital television services in developing regions that prioritise Chinese state-backed media content.<\/p>\n Chinese data harvesting overseas \u201chas enabled Beijing to fine-tune global censorship by targeting specific individuals and organisations,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n \u201cUnchecked, Beijing\u2019s efforts could result in …. a sharp contraction of global freedom of expression,\u201d the report said.<\/p>\n Beijing employs bots, trolls, and coordinated social media campaigns to boost pro-PRC content and to drown out critical voices.<\/p>\n \u201cThrough flooding \u2013 a tactic that manipulates search engine results and hashtag searches \u2013 the PRC drowns out information around sensitive topics or events with unrelated content and renders fact-based, substantive information more difficult for users to find,\u201d the report said.<\/p>\n For example, over 1000 pro-PRC accounts also sought to bury a report by the Spain-based nongovernmental organisation Safeguard Defenders that detailed the presence and coercive activities of 100 \u201coverseas police service stations\u201d in 53 countries.<\/p>\n Despite unprecedented resources devoted to the campaign, Beijing had encountered \u201cmajor setbacks\u201d when targeting democratic countries due to local media and civil society push back, according to the report, which was produced under a congressional mandate to detail state information manipulation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n