Dossier of documents about Facebook data scandal is published by MPs
6th December 2018

British politician releases 250 pages of seized Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg emails which reveal they wanted to charge companies at least $250,000 per year for access to users’ data

  • British MP Damian Collins published more than 250 pages of seized documents 
  • They reveal plans to offer firms access to user data based on their spending
  • Included are emails from Zuckerberg himself where he talks about restricting access to user data as a way to leverage money out of app developers
  • U.S. judge had ordered the papers remain secret, but Collins defied the order 
  • e-mail

59

View
comments


Damian Collins, the chairman of Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said there was a ‘considerable public interest’ in the papers

A huge dossier of secret documents about the Facebook data scandal was published by British MPs today in defiance of a US court order. 

The trove of emails and private messages, which was was seized by MP Damian Collins last month, reveals how Facebook wanted to leverage companies into spending big on advertising in return for access to user data.

The social media giant, which has taken a hammering on stock markets in recent months, was saved from an immediate reaction because the New York Stock Exchange was closed on Wednesday for George H.W. Bush’s funeral.

However, further losses were expected on Thursday when it reopens.  

The messages discuss changes that Facebook made to its site in 2015 which limited the amount of data that certain apps could extract from the Facebook friends of their users.

The ThisIsYourDigitalLife app exploited this feature to get information from millions of Facebook profiles despite only having around 300,000 direct users, which it later sold to political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica.

In emails sent ahead of the changes being implemented, Facebook senior staff discussed ‘whitelisting’ several apps – including Lyft, Tinder, and AirBnB – meaning they would keep full access to friend data.

However, the emails make it clear that access to such data would depend on how much the companies were paying Facebook.

In one particularly blunt email sent by Konstantinos Papamiltidas, Facebook’s director of platform partnerships, he said: ‘Communicate in one-go to all apps that don’t spend that those permission[s] will be revoked. 

‘Communicate to the rest that they need to spend on NEKO [a platform that Facebook uses to sell advertising] $250k a year to maintain access to the data.’

In another email from Mark Zuckerberg himself, sent in 2012, he lays out his vision for how Facebook will generate money in the future, including leveraging developers for access to data.


Collins took the decision to publish the documents after Mark Zuckerberg refused to testify directly to the investigation he is leading into fake news

He writes: ‘I’m getting more on board with locking down some parts of platform, including friends data and potentially email addresses for mobile apps.

‘Without limiting distribution or access to friends who use this app, I don’t think we have any way to get developers to pay us at all…’ 

Mr Collins, the chairman of Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: ‘Facebook have clearly entered into whitelisting agreements with certain companies, which meant that after the platform changes in 2014/15 they maintained full access to friends data. 

‘It is not clear that there was any user consent for this, nor how Facebook decided which companies should be whitelisted or not. 

‘It is clear that increasing revenues from major app developers was one of the key drivers behind the… changes at Facebook. 

  • Secret legal advice warned Cabinet the Irish backstop is… ‘Why don’t you all grow a pair!’ Piers Morgan calls Dominic…

Share this article

‘The idea of linking access to friends data to the financial value of the developers relationship with Facebook is a recurring feature of the documents.’

Defending his decision to publish the papers, which contravenes a California judge who ruled they should remain a secret, he added that there was a ‘considerable public interest’.

He said Facebook had failed to give ‘straight answers’ to his inquiry after Mark Zuckerberg failed to show up to a grand committee featuring politicians from eight countries last week.

Mr Collins seized the documents from the owner of a controversial app maker Six4Three last month using his parliamentary privilege.

Where do the Six4Three Facebook papers come from?

The documents seized by Collins and his committee stem from a court case being heard in California between app developer Six4Three and Facebook.

Ted Kramer, who owns the developer, launched a suit against Facebook after the tech company restricted to data that one of his apps – Pinkini – could access.

The app was designed to identify bikini photos among albums posted by friends on Facebook, and the restrictions effectively killed it. 

As part of the lawsuit, Kramer accuses Facebook of encouraging developers to build apps based around access to data that it then withdrew.

He also alleges that Zuckerberg sold expensive ads to developers in return for long-term access to the data.

This form of access was later exploited by Cambridge Analytica in an attempt to affect elections. 

As part of his case, Kramer got his hands on documents – said to include confidential emails between senior executives, and correspondence with Zuckerberg – apparently showing they knew about issues around the privacy of user data.

Facebook fought for months to keep the documents secret, and was ultimately vindicated when a California judge ruled in its favor.

But now Collins has published the documents because he is outside of US jurisdiction and protected in his role as a minister heading up an investigation.   

The dossier includes emails written by Mr Zuckerberg himself, as well as hundreds of documents about privileged access to data given by Facebook to certain applications.

Mr Collins said: ‘I believe there is considerable public interest in releasing these documents.  

‘They raise important questions about how Facebook treats users data, their policies for working with app developers, and how they exercise their dominant position in the social media market.

‘We don’t feel we have had straight answers from Facebook on these important issues, which is why we are releasing the documents.

‘We need a more public debate about the rights of social media users and the smaller businesses who are required to work with the tech giants. I hope that our committee investigation can stand up for them.’ 

The leak relates to a court case between Facebook, an app developer called Six4Three and its app Pinkini, which allowed users to find bikini photos among images uploaded by their friends.

The app was effectively killed when Facebook updated its privacy settings in 2015, and the company is now suing the social media giant.

As part of the legal proceedings, Six4Three was handed a trove of documents from Facebook related to its case, but was told to keep them private.

They were seized by Collins using an obscure parliamentary rule as a Six4Three executive was passing through London in November.

Reacting to the documents being published, a Facebook spokesman said: ‘As we’ve said many times, the documents Six4Three gathered for their baseless case are only part of the story and are presented in a way that is very misleading without additional context. 

‘We stand by the platform changes we made in 2015 to stop a person from sharing their friends’ data with developers. 

‘Like any business, we had many of internal conversations about the various ways we could build a sustainable business model for our platform. 

‘But the facts are clear: we’ve never sold people’s data.’ 

Mr Zuckerberg was ’empty chaired’ by the grand committee last week after sent executive Richard Allan for the grilling instead.

Facebook had demanded the Six4Three papers published today be handed back without being opened by MPs or published. 


Mr Zuckerberg was ’empty chaired’ by the grand committee last week after sent executive Richard Allan for the grilling instead

Six4Three managing director Ted Kramer gave the documents to British authorities after being warned he could be banned from leaving the UK if he refused.

In an extraordinary sequence of events, he ignored three demands for the emails before being personally served by a Serjeant at Arms and meeting Mr Collins in his Commons office. 

MPs drew up the ‘unprecedented’ order to seize the documents after discovering that Mr Kramer was due to visit the UK.

Mr Kramer has claimed in court documents he ‘panicked’ while in the meeting with Mr Collins and his staff, meaning he copied documents from his cloud storage and onto a USB stick.   

What are the accusations against Facebook?

Facebook is facing allegations from all over the work that it has been used to spread ‘fake news’, interfere with elections, and peddle hate.

It is also facing hugely damaging revelations of privacy data breaches among its accounts.

Here are some of the controversies it has been embroiled in: 

‘Fake news’ and Russia 

Facebook has come under the spotlight amid claims that Russian accounts used the platform to spread ‘fake news’ during the 2016  Brexit referendum.

In America, Russians accounts have been accused of using Facebook to harm Hilary Clinton’s prospects of being elected over Donald Trump. 

In the UK, some have claimed that misleading information was used to promote Brexit in the run up to the 2016 referendum. 

Cambridge Analytica Scandal:

The data of around 87 million Facebook users was harvested by the company Cambridge Analytica (CA).

It has been claimed CA used the information to assess peoples’ personalities and come up with political strategies to sway voters to back Brexit and Donald Trump.

Spread of extremism and hate

Facebook has been repeatedly criticised for not being quick enough to take extremist content down from its site.

Critics have warned that Facebook has become a safe haven for extremists who peddle hate and try to recruit jihadis to kill and maim.

But after seizing the documents, Mr Collins said: ‘Under UK law and parliamentary privilege we can publish papers if we choose to.

‘As you know we have asked many questions of Facebook about its policies on sharing user data.

‘I believe these documents may contain important information.’ 

In a statement issued after the committee hearing today, Facebook said of the claim  that an engineer had flagged concerns about Russians trawling the site for data: ‘The engineers who had flagged these initial concerns subsequently looked into this further and found no evidence of specific Russian activity.’ 

Lord Allan has also urged Mr Collins not to reveal the documents. He warned Collins yesterday in an email that the documents are ‘sub judice before a court in California’ and are ‘sealed’.  

Lord Allan is a Liberal Democrat peer and unlike previous Facebook witnesses at the House of Commons is an expert in Parliament’s procedures.

He spent eight years as MP for Sheffield Hallam and was succeeded by Nick Clegg, who has since been hired by Facebook since he lost the seat last year.  

A US judge in California had ordered the files, obtained from Facebook via a legal discovery process, could not be revealed to the public earlier this year. 

Mr Zuckerberg has repeatedly refused to attend the UK Parliament saying that he has already testified to Congress in the US and before the European Union.

‘It is not possible for Mr Zuckerberg to be available to all parliaments,’ the firm said.  

Facebook said after the documents were seized: ‘The materials obtained by the DCMS committee are subject to a protective order of the San Mateo Superior Court restricting their disclosure.

‘We have asked the DCMS committee to refrain from reviewing them and to return them to counsel or to Facebook.

‘We have no further comment.’

What is the Cambridge Analytica scandal?

Consultancy firm Cambridge Analytica had offices in London, New York, Washington, as well as Brazil and Malaysia.

The company boasts it can ‘find your voters and move them to action’ through data-driven campaigns and a team that includes data scientists and behavioural psychologists. 

In 2013, Cambridge professor Aleksandr Kogan used his app, This Is Your Digital Life, to ask 270,000 Facebook users questions about their personalities.

By answering them, the users granted Kogan access to not only their profiles but to those of their friends.

He subsequently sold that information to Cambridge Analytica for $51million.

Facebook changed its rules in 2014 to limit what data such apps could access.

A year later, the company learned that Kogan had sold his findings and contacted both him and Cambridge Analytica to tell them to delete the data which they promised to do.

In March, Facebook made its announcement that it had suspended Cambridge Analytica after being warned of looming media reports that claimed not all of the information had been destroyed.

Those reports, which were informed by the accounts of whistleblowers who worked at the firm, also revealed the true scale of the breach.  

It was initially estimated that the firm was able to mine the information of 55 million Facebook users even though just 270,000 people gave them permission to do so.

But Facebook later since revealed the number was actually as high as 87 million. 

The data firm suspended its chief executive, Alexander Nix, after recordings emerged of him making a series of controversial claims, including boasts that Cambridge Analytica had a pivotal role in the election of Donald Trump.

The same information is said to have been used to help the Brexit campaign in the UK.  

Source: Read Full Article